You said you are from HK right? You must have heard of the concept ofjudicial review (when the court declare a law or a government'slegislation to be unconstitutional and void it) then......... It is anold concept (administrative law)...... and the first major casehappened back in 1803 (Marbury vs Madison).
2) Hold on, you were the one who quoted from the presenter first (youmentioned he said "rebellion" a few pages back).... now suddenly, thatbecame unreliable......
Also, did you not hear the gunshots? Did you not see the tanks firingat the crowd? Did you not see the wounded and the dead in that doctors'scene?
3.) You know what my argument is (and it still stands)..... Were theyall 顛覆政權、暴亂情況?? Was execution the right punishment (even for thestudent leaders)? No one was innoccent?
And I have quoted a few foreign examples on treason (as requested byyou) to support my argument...... You are the one who haven't answeredmy question.....
4.) The mechanism of impeachment/ a vote of no confidence is that asimple majority should be passed to initiate the process (SU committee)just like in the USA or UK (even less complicated in terms of process).
You can disagree with the reason for that impeachment (look at UShistory, an impeachment was launched against President Andrew Johnsonin 1868 because he dismissed a minister !!!).... but remember, the vote(referendum in this case) is the last gatekeeper....... and what givethe process its legality......
I don't see why do you oppose the process that much...... You know,unlike China.... Hong Kong also has a similar impeachment mechanism(not with a referendum but the Legco has power over that mechanism).....
P.S. As I said, 陳一諤 has violated collective responsibility...... andyou seemed to have agreed..... so I really don't see why are youopposing the whole thing.....
1.) You are side-tracking on the argument here...... my original argument was the Chinese Law itself was unjust...... so your point of the CCP "acting according to law" is simply flawed.....
有陣時我真係唔明,
其實我係refer to 九龍皇帝既回應,唔係你既回應......
