• 瀏覽: 7,734
  • 回覆: 3
India Has Lost Presence In 26 Of 65 Patrol Points In Eastern Ladakh: Report
 
The report was filed at last week's annual conference of the country's top police officers in Delhi, attended by PM Modi and Amit Shah.
 
印度在拉達克東部 65 個巡邏點中的 26 個失去了存在:報告
該報告是在上周于德里舉行的國家高級警官年度會議上提交的,莫迪總理和阿米特沙阿出席了會議。
新德里:
聯合領土一名高級警官的一份報告稱,印度已經無法進入拉達克東部 65 個巡邏點中的 26 個,這是一個令人擔憂的新披露,因為該國在 3500 公裡邊界沿線的各個爆發點與中國對峙。
“目前有 65 個 PP(巡邏點)從喀喇崑崙山口到 Chumur,由 ISF(印度安全部隊)定期巡邏。在 65 個 PP 中,我們的存在消失在 26 個 PP(即 PP 號 5- 17、24-32、37,由于 ISF 的巡邏限制或沒有巡邏,”拉達克主要城市列城的警察局長 PD Nitya 根據 NDTV 獲得的研究論文寫道。
該報告是在上周于德里舉行的該國高級警官年度會議上提交的,出席會議的有總理納倫德拉·莫迪、聯邦內政部長阿米特·沙阿和國家安全顧問阿吉特·多瓦爾。

“後來,中國迫使我們接受這樣一個事實,即由于這些地區長期以來沒有看到 ISF 或平民的存在,中國人出現在這些地區。這導致 ISF 控制的邊界向印度一側轉移並在所有這些口袋中創建一個“緩衝區”,最終導致印度失去對這些地區的控制。PLA(中國人民解放軍)這種逐寸搶地的策略被稱為“切香腸” ,“ 它說。
“解放軍在降級談判中利用了緩衝區,將他們最好的攝像機放在最高峰並監視我們部隊的行動……他們甚至反對我們在緩衝區的行動,聲稱這是‘他們的‘行動區域,然后進一步要求我們撤回以創建更多的‘緩衝區’區域,”該官員寫道。
她說,中國的這種戰略在加爾萬河谷得到了體現,2020 年,20 名印度士兵和至少 4 名中國士兵在一場致命衝突中死于肉搏戰。
Nitya 女士還表示,將區域標記為禁區並使其保持荒蕪也會影響部隊士氣。“在與一名部隊駐紮在前沿地區的高級軍官的互動中,他表示,如果向后撤退 400 米,我們可以與解放軍換來 4 年的和平,那是值得的,”報告稱。
政府尚未就此披露發表評論。在最先報道這名警官的研究論文的《印度教報》上,一位國防消息人士反駁了它的說法,稱“沒有因在摩擦地區脫離接觸而失去領土”。
“在外交解決爭端之前,一些地區的巡邏受到限制。沒有牧場丟失。在脫離接觸的地區,我們擁有與解放軍一樣多的攝像頭和技術手段,因此在該地區的控制力與解放軍一樣多,甚至更多,”該報援引消息人士的話說。
他們說,軍方與民政部門一起“鼓勵並提供所有設施”,允許當地人和他們的牛群進入放牧地點。
 

就在一個多月前,印度指責中國試圖“單方面改變”他們事實上的邊界(即實際控制線)的現狀,當時衝突導致雙方軍隊受傷。
3個注釋12 月 9 日在阿魯納恰爾邦發生的事件被視為自 2020 年加勒萬河谷衝突導致兩國敵對行動急劇升級以來最嚴重的對峙。此后的一系列軍事會談導致雙方謹慎撤軍。
 
 
 
New Delhi: 
India has lost access to 26 of 65 patrolling points in Eastern Ladakh, a report by a senior police officer in the union territory has said, in a worrying new disclosure amid the country's standoff with China at various flashpoints along their tottery 3,500-km frontier.
"Presently there are 65 PPs (Patrolling Points) starting from Karakoram pass to Chumur which are to be patrolled regularly by the ISFs (Indian Security Forces). Out of 65 PPs, our presence is lost in 26 PPs (i.e. PP no. 5-17, 24-32, 37, due to restrictive or no patrolling by the ISFs," PD Nitya, the Superintendent of Police of Leh, Ladakh's main city, wrote according to the research paper accessed by NDTV.
The report was filed at last week's annual conference of the country's top police officers in Delhi, attended by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah and National Security Advisor Ajit Doval.

"Later on, China forces us to accept the fact that as such areas have not seen the presence of ISFs or civilians since long, the Chinese were present in these areas. This leads to a shift in the border under control of ISFs towards Indian side and a "buffer zone" is created in all such pockets which ultimately leads to loss of control over these areas by India. This tactic of PLA (China's People's Liberation Army) to grab land inch-by-inch is known as 'Salami slicing'," it said.
"PLA has taken advantage of the buffer areas in the de-escalation talks by placing their best of cameras on the highest peaks and monitoring the movement of our forces... they object our movement even in the buffer zone, claiming it to be 'their' area of operation and then further ask us to move back to create more 'buffer' areas," the officer wrote.
She said this Chinese strategy was seen in Galwan Valley, the site of a deadly clash in 2020 when 20 Indian troops and at least four Chinese soldiers died in hand-to-hand fighting.
Ms Nitya also said that marking areas as out of bounds and keeping them barren affects troop morale as well. "During an interaction with one senior officer whose unit is based right on forward area, he shared that, if by retreating 400 metres back, we can buy peace with PLA for 4 years, then it's worth it," the report said.
The government is yet to comment on the disclosure. Speaking to The Hindu newspaper, which first reported the police officer's research paper, a defence source countered its assertions, saying "there is no loss of territory due to disengagement in friction areas".
"Some areas have been restricted for patrolling for both sides pending diplomatic resolution of disputes. No pasture lands have been lost. In disengaged areas, we have as many cameras and technical means as the PLA and hence dominate the area as much, if not more," the newspaper quoted the source as saying.
They said the military was "encouraging and providing all facilities", in conjunction with the civilian administration, to allow locals and their cattle in grazing locations.
 

The report comes just over a month after India accused China of trying to "unilaterally change the status quo" on their de-facto border, known as the Line of Actual Control, when clashes left troops on both sides injured.
3CommentsThe December 9 incident in Arunachal Pradesh was seen as the most serious face-off since the Galwan Valley clash in 2020 which led to a sharp escalation in hostilities between the two countries. A series of military talks since then have led to a careful pullback of troops on both sides.
 
 
 
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/india-has-lost-presence-in-26-of-65-patrol-points-in-eastern-ladakh-report-3722533



5-17,24-32,27
我的數學不好,怎樣數都只是23個,剩下的3個數不出來。🤣


Out of 65 PPs, our presence is lost in 26 PPs (i.e. PP no. 5-17, 24-32, 37, due to restrictive or no patrolling by the ISFs,"



引用:
原帖由 sheung1009 於 2023-1-27 13:35 發表
5-17,24-32,27
我的數學不好,怎樣數都只是23個,剩下的3個數不出來。🤣


Out of 65 PPs, our presence is lost in 26 PPs (i.e. PP no. 5-17, 24-32, 37, due to restrictive or no patrolling by the ISFs,"
加上3哥,剛剛夠26



嚇死印度人了


[按此隱藏 Google 建議的相符內容]