• 瀏覽: 7,092
  • 回覆: 55
  • 追帖: 1
本主題由 motivation 於 2020-9-19 10:13 PM 移動
[隱藏]
況且,RT-PCR 測試都是不可靠的。點解?它測試的根本不是特殊的新冠病毒。新冠肺炎只是一個俗稱。

CDC自己發佈的 RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel 指南,已經說明 PCR 根本不是在測試什麼 Covid-19,測試的只是模仿臨床樣本mimic clinical specimen的RNA,因為病毒株從來未有被孤立過,意味新病毒根本就不存在。
@三十九頁
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.

這段文列明了測試器是根據 characterized clinical specimen“特徵臨床標本”來做測試,因為從來都未有covid19病毒株被孤立出來,意思是CDC測試的做法是首先他們抽取了一個有症狀的病人的樣本做榜樣,然後根據這個有病的榜樣測試出能夠模仿呢個“特徵臨床標本”的RNA!



回覆 引用 TOP

熱賣及精選
你要看看他們怎樣定義 covid-19;PCR test 的病毒根本就是SARS和297個其它普通流感樣本翻炒改名重新定義:

《 Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR 》

Aim
We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available.

Methods
Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.

Results
The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV. Through coordination between academic and public laboratories, we confirmed assay exclusivity based on 297 original clinical specimens containing a full spectrum of human respiratory viruses.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988269/



回覆 引用 TOP

天滅美共


回覆 引用 TOP

引用:
原帖由 小室 於 2020-10-17 03:22 PM 發表


歐洲誠實的醫護專業人士發起了
世界醫生聯盟
WORLD DOCTORS ALLIANCE First Hearing
@22:40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDj1NO4mjgc

有不少醫生親口提及歐美對新冠確診報大數的各種報酬,很多時候官方指引連測試都不用,就直接寫入死亡證。
Elke De Klerk 醫生
asked to me  ...
有朋友住在義大利,他看報章報導一名醫生,5月寫了一封公開信,說: 這是一個政治問題,而不是健康問題。 他還說,美國8百萬人確診, 難道是美國人自我誇大確診人數?
還有印度診確人數為何要爭著超越美國?
而巴西那些不太冷的國家, 確診人數正在急追亞季軍? 也是謊報嗎?



[隱藏]
引用:
原帖由 劉婕 於 2020-10-19 10:04 AM 發表


有朋友住在義大利,他看報章報導一名醫生,5月寫了一封公開信,說: 這是一個政治問題,而不是健康問題。 他還說,美國8百萬人確診, 難道是美國人自我誇大確診人數?
還有印度診確人數為何要爭著超越美國?
而巴西那些不太冷的國家, 確診人數正在急追亞季軍? 也是謊報嗎? ...
一班歐洲醫護專業人士發起了《世界醫生聯盟》,表示世界各地疫情數據有嚴重不實情況,包括濫用政府報酬,上面帖的

Elke De Klerk 醫生 @21:20 簡單解釋了在歐洲嚴重賄賂報大數情況;@22:40 她指明:
“They asked me to mark patient when he would die as a covid-19 patient even without a positive test.”:
WORLD DOCTORS ALLIANCE First Hearing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDj1NO4mjgc

四月時,身兼 Minnesota 明尼蘇達州參議員的 Dr. Scott Jensen 醫生一早就爆左料每單新冠case都會會獲發醫療保險近四萬,但其實只是掩飾了更大的政府「救濟金」:
三百億「救濟金」 package 派發美國各州醫院,統計每單「確診」的收入如下:

April 10

HHS recently began distributing the first $30 billion of emergency funding designated for hospitals in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act.
Below is a breakdown of how much funding per COVID-19 case each state will receive from the first $30 billion in aid. Kaiser Health News used a state breakdown provided to the House Ways and Means Committee by HHS along with COVID-19 cases tabulated by The New York Times for its analysis.
Alabama
$158,000 per COVID-19 case
Alaska$306,000
Arizona$23,000
Arkansas$285,000
California$145,000
Colorado$58,000
Connecticut$38,000
Delaware$127,000
District of Columbia$56,000
Florida$132,000
Georgia$73,000
Hawaii$301,000
Idaho$100,000
Illinois$73,000
Indiana$105,000
Iowa$235,000
Kansas$291,000
Kentucky$297,000
Louisiana$26,000
Maine
$260,000
Maryland$120,000
Massachusetts$44,000
Michigan$44,000
Minnesota$380,000
Mississippi$166,000
Missouri$175,000
Montana$315,000
Nebraska$379,000
Nevada$98,000
New Hampshire$201,000
New Jersey$18,000
New Mexico$171,000
New York$12,000
North Carolina$252,000
North Dakota$339,000
Ohio$180,000
Oklahoma$291,000
Oregon$220,000
Pennsylvania$68,000
Rhode Island$52,000
South Carolina$186,000
South Dakota$241,000
Tennessee$166,000
Texas$184,000
Utah$94,000
Vermont$87,000
Virginia$201,000
Washington$58,000
West Virginia$471,000
Wisconsin$163,000
Wyoming$278,000
https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2020/04/10/hhs-to-begin-immediate-delivery-of-initial-30-billion-of-cares-act-provider-relief-funding.html
https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/state-by-state-breakdown-of-federal-aid-per-covid-19-case.html


[ 本帖最後由 小室 於 2020-10-19 10:54 AM 編輯 ]



拒絕受賄的白俄羅斯

如果我們理性考慮利益關係,封城肯定有利說服平民接受和習慣強權措施。

不過又唔係個個國家都稀罕呢啲強權遊戲,像當年卡特菲咁唔買美國賬,我們其實應該致敬 白俄羅斯總統 盧卡申科,他寧願拒絕 IMF 九億的賄賂都堅定唔封城:

On 16 March, the President of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, dismissed the threat of coronavirus and encouraged working in fields and driving tractors as a way of overcoming the pandemic: "You just have to work, especially now, in a village [...] there, the tractor will heal everyone. The fields heal everyone."[url=#cite_note-Lukashenko_tractors-239][239][/url] In his further comments on the pandemic, the Belarusian leader referred to it as "psychosis", and on 28 March he played a game of hockey, later stating in an interview "it is better to die on our feet, than live on your knees [...] sport, especially on ice, is better than any antiviral medication, it is the real thing".[url=#cite_note-Lukashenko_hockey-240][240][/url][url=#cite_note-onliner_hockey-241][241][/url] Prior to that, in an official meeting, Lukashenko proposed "poisoning" the coronavirus with vodka, as well as attending banyas as the best cures for the disease.[url=#cite_note-cnn_vodka_banya-242][242][/url]

On 30 March 2020, Belarus and International Monetary Fund (IMF) started negotiations on a $900 million loan intended to compensate the economic losses from the coronavirus pandemic.[url=#cite_note-tut_IMF_loan_1-295][295][/url] On 19 June 2020, Alexander Lukashenko stated the IMF was demanding imposition of lockdown measures as a condition for loans, but the demands were declined by Minsk.[url=#cite_note-296][296][/url] On 10 September, Belarus was refused the loan due to "significant disagreements on the reacting measures to current difficulties".[url=#cite_note-IMF_loan_refused-297][297][/url]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_Belarus



回覆 引用 TOP

引用:
原帖由 小室 於 2020-10-19 10:16 AM 發表


一班歐洲醫護專業人士發起了《世界醫生聯盟》,表示世界各地疫情數據有嚴重不實情況,包括濫用政府報酬,上面帖的

Elke De Klerk 醫生 @21:20 簡單解釋了在歐洲嚴重賄賂報大數情況;@22:40 她指明:
“They asked me to mark patient when he would die as a covid-19 patient even without a  ...
如果該報導是事實, 歐洲人的人性真是墮落到一個點。
也說明了歐美的媒體是受操控的, 談不上言論自由。

[ 本帖最後由 劉婕 於 2020-10-19 10:25 AM 編輯 ]



近來越來越多專家企出來宣言封城是不必要的,而家比以前夠膽出來講都是因為意識到不滿歐美政府不實民意已經接近主流。史丹福的 John Ioannidis 說封城造成的死傷更大,Pfizer 的 Dr. Mike Yeadon,和最近WHO的一位專家 Dr. David Nabarro 都出來說不應該封城。

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigations/stanford-professor-warns-covid-shelter-in-place-orders-are-killing-people/2376796/
https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/coronavirus-who-backflips-on-virus-stance-by-condemning-lockdowns/news-story/f2188f2aebff1b7b291b297731c3da74

我想看看香港有人會留意這些專家的「第二意見」嗎:
https://news.discuss.com.hk/viewthread.php?tid=29487123

《大巴靈頓宣言》

這個宣言是由哈弗、牛津、和史丹福流行病學家發起對社會政策的一種專業第二意見「second opinion」。他們認為封城帶來的破壞根本遠超流行病,實屬弊多於利。(我明白封城有利制止暴亂行為,所以特別歡迎封城,但同時也會摧殘很多人生計,進一步挑戰社會原貌的命運)

香港有冇人支持這班專家?你會來簽名嗎?你支持全城封鎖香港嗎?

https://gbdeclaration.org/
gbdeclaration.org/great-barrington-declaration-simplified-chinese/

請願書目前已獲超過一萬名科學家,近三萬名專業醫護人士,和五十萬以上深表關切的市民簽署支持。
https://summit.news/2020/10/07/over-6000-scientists-doctors-sign-anti-lockdown-petition/

Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University
Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert



回覆 引用 TOP

引用:
原帖由 劉婕 於 2020-10-19 10:20 AM 發表


如果該報導是事實, 歐洲人的人性真是墮落到一個點。
也說明了歐美的媒體是受操控的, 談不上言論自由。
全世界都很多種種的滅聲。澳洲有警察上門拉人(孕婦因一個得到有五個 like的 fb 留言被捕)。不過柏林的反抗因為有大眾支持,好像開始被柏林政府重視,近日推翻封城措施。

我帖了一個主題介紹《大巴靈頓宣言》,《世界醫生聯盟》,想分享一下世界走勢,但主題違規被刪除。
所以另外在 香港及世界新聞討論 帖了一個介紹 Great Barrington Declaration and Petition。都是名牌大專學家發起的宣言。香港人會點睇呢啲聲音呢?

[ 本帖最後由 小室 於 2020-10-19 10:48 AM 編輯 ]



[隱藏]
引用:
原帖由 小室 於 2020-10-19 10:44 AM 發表


全世界都很多種種的滅聲。澳洲有警察上門拉人(孕婦因一個得到有五個 like的 fb 留言被捕)。不過柏林的反抗因為有大眾支持,好像開始被柏林政府重視,近日推翻封城措施。

我帖了一個主題介紹《大巴靈頓宣言》,《世界醫生聯盟》,想分享一下世界走勢,但主題違規被刪除。
所以另外在 香港及世界新聞討論 帖了一個介紹 Great Barrington Declaration and Petiti ...
香港只有班黃醫護和袁國勇提議封城, 沒有多少專家建議封城。
再講, 即使有市民附和封城建議, 也是針對性的, 出於政治考量的。
我就呼籲政府針對美國, 印度和巴西的入境或過境者而封關。
仇中的黃醫護當然就只針對國內的同胞了。



引用:
原帖由 劉婕 於 2020-10-19 10:56 AM 發表


香港只有班黃醫護和袁國勇提議封城, 沒有多少專家建議封城。
再講, 即使有市民附和封城建議, 也是針對性的, 出於政治考量的。
我就呼籲政府針對美國, 印度和巴西的入境或過境者而封關。
仇中的黃醫護當然就只針對國內的同胞了。 ...
劉婕,
你說得對,真係可惜大部份人都唔可以抽離政治立場和動機,所以客觀事實很難分享。就算學懂大批學問都難免感覺學非所用,所以多謝你對這些資料的關心。

這個疫情行動其實只是一個多方位立體的佈局。如果你有胃口睇深一層的話,可以看看我早前預言十月的疫情爆發,因為它是有排程,有劇本的:
https://www.discuss.com.hk/viewt ... 527880#pid526527880



回覆 引用 TOP

提示:支持鍵盤翻頁左 右
[按此隱藏 Google 建議的相符內容]