• 瀏覽: 11,437
  • 回覆: 82
+12
引用:
原帖由 cnfr 於 2020-8-9 09:44 PM 發表

功課係一定要自己做嘅,你抄一次自己仍然唔識做。授權造飛機唔係做功課吖嘛,授權可以話係老師授課,仲要教到識造為止。
當然,如果抄一次功課自己就識晒,咁又唔怕抄喎。 ...
Tu-144咪就係咁嘅1鑊粥囉
所以話俄佬都唔知自己做啲乜嘢又學人做



引用:
原帖由 cwilson1 於 2020-8-9 09:53 PM 發表

特朗普咁出講嘢唔算數, 今天簽約明日退約, 你好心咪又扮睇唔到啦,
你有冇睇樓上講呀
離題舉你呀



引用:
原帖由 cnfr 於 2020-8-9 09:54 PM 發表


分開研製,抄乜鬼啫。至於美國佬加入,係九十年代之後嘅事。美國佬偷到技術之後成個計劃就無疾而終。
啲人思考障礙真係講句嘢都唔成嘢不甚了了



引用:
原帖由 cnfr 於 2020-8-9 09:57 PM 發表


人哋一直服役到1987年,係你話一鑊粥啫。
啊?
又唔係無疾而終了嗎?
你不如叫呢度文學版啦



[隱藏]
引用:
原帖由 cnfr 於 2020-8-9 10:23 PM 發表


你唔明啊?咁以你嘅水平剩係識講抄功課,我哋就講抄功課啦。

你功課都未做完,人哋就先做完咗。人哋點抄你啲功課啫?
軍盲即係軍盲
你知唔知研製1架飛機幾多年?
早3個月試飛同跑去教授間房交功課有乜分別?



引用:
原帖由 cnfr 於 2020-8-9 10:30 PM 發表


睇唔明啊?咁就遷就你嘅水平,換句話同你講喇。

圖144至少唔係最“危險”嘅客機。

協和飛機係世界上最「危險」的民航客機,每一百萬次航班的喪生旅客數為12.5人,比安全紀錄第二差嘅客機仲要高三倍。

邊個係一鑊粥一目了然。 ...
因為最後做咗貨機吖嘛



引用:
原帖由 輪皇 於 2020-8-10 09:31 AM 發表
AV-8「獵鷹II式」(英語:AV-8 Harrier II)是美國引自英國航太的獵鷹式戰鬥攻擊機版本。AV-8是美國海軍陸戰隊的現役攻擊機,能夠短距起飛/垂直起降(STOVL)。該攻擊機由英國航太公司設計,麥道公司製造。
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/AV-8%E7%8D%B5%E9%B7%B9II%E5%BC%8F%E6%94%BB%E6%93%8A%E6%A9 ...
截然不同,天壤之別,無疾而未終

The Harrier II retains the tandem landing gear layout of the first-generation Harriers, although each outrigger landing gear leg was moved from the wingtip to mid-span for a tighter turning radius when taxiing.[70] The engine intakes are larger than those of the first-generation Harrier, and have a revised inlet. On the underside of the fuselage, McDonnell Douglas added lift-improvement devices, which capture the reflected engine exhaust when close to the ground, giving the equivalent of up to 1,200 lb (544 kg) of extra lift.[70][71]

The technological advances incorporated into the Harrier II, compared with the original Harrier, significantly reduce the workload on the pilot. The supercritical wing, hands-on-throttle-and-stick (HOTAS) control principle, and increased engineered lateral stability make the aircraft fundamentally easier to fly.[72][73] Ed Harper, general manager for the McDonnell Douglas Harrier II development program, summarized: "The AV-8B looks a lot like the original Harrier and it uses the same operating fundamentals. It just uses them a lot better".[74] A large cathode-ray tube multi-purpose display, taken from the F/A-18, makes up much of the instrument panel in the cockpit. It has a wide range of functions, including radar warning information and weapon delivery checklist.[68] The pilots sit on UPC/Stencel 10B zero-zero ejection seats, meaning that they are able to eject from a stationary aircraft at zero altitude.[75][76]


Airframe       

For the AV-8B, McDonnell Douglas redesigned the entire airframe of the Harrier, incorporating numerous structural and aerodynamic changes. To improve visibility and better accommodate the crew and avionics hardware, McDonnell Douglas elevated the cockpit by 10.5 in (27 cm) and redesigned the canopy. This improved the forward (17° down), side (60°), and rear visibility.[77][78] The front fuselage is composed of a molded skin with an epoxy-based core sandwiched between two carbon-fiber sheets.[78]

To compensate for the changes in the front fuselage, the rear fuselage was extended by 18 in (46 cm), and the taller vertical stabilizer of the Sea Harrier was used.[78] The tail assembly is made up of composites to reduce weight.[77]

Perhaps the most thorough redesign was of the wing, the objective being to match the performance of the cancelled AV-16 while retaining the Pegasus engine of the AV-8A.[79] Engineers designed a new, one-piece supercritical wing, which improves cruise performance by delaying the rise in drag and increasing lift-to-drag ratio.[79] Made of composites, the wing is thicker and has a longer span than that of the AV-8A. Compared to the AV-8A's wing, it has a higher aspect ratio, reduced sweep (from 40° to 37°), and an area increased from 200 sq ft (18.6 m2) to 230 sq ft (21.4 m2). The wing has a high-lift configuration, employing flaps that deploy automatically when maneuvering, and drooped ailerons. Using the leading edge root extensions, the new wing allows for a 6,700 lb (3,035 kg) increase in payload compared with the first-generation Harriers after a 1,000 ft (300 m) takeoff roll.[80] Because the wing is almost exclusively composite, it is 330 lb (150 kg) lighter than the AV-8A's smaller wing.



引用:
原帖由 cnfr 於 2020-8-10 01:05 PM 發表


傻佬,唔理你功課做幾多年都好,人哋做完先過你就冇可能係抄你嘅。
啲軍盲真係小學雞嚟嘅
全部都係啲“我唔理,總之講咗唔算”嘅邏輯



引用:
原帖由 cnfr 於 2020-8-10 01:10 PM 發表


做貨機係因爲蘇聯當年市場冇需求吖嘛。
總之人哋響商業營運中冇嚴重事故,唔似協合式在商業營運發生空難。
整架閪機梗係冇市場
超音速貨運



[隱藏]
引用:
原帖由 cnfr 於 2020-8-10 03:49 PM 發表


抄功課係邊個講嘅?呢啲咪小學雞囉。
總之你地就係自己講咁又唔算咁又唔算



引用:
原帖由 cnfr 於 2020-8-10 03:51 PM 發表


係蘇聯國內以至東歐共産集團內都冇好似歐美之間跨大西洋嘅高速客運需求。
concord香港都飛過
有錢就有得坐嘅高檔嘢嚟
唔同俄佬閪機一出場就表演炒機搵鬼坐



引用:
原帖由 erkc 於 2020-8-10 05:29 PM 發表


正確來說"Harrier II"不是AV-8而是AV-8B,AV-8是最早期由Hawker Siddeley開發的"Harrier"
另外英國Aerospace開發的不是AV-8B而是作為"Harrier"艦載版的"Sea Harrier",AV-8B則是由McDonnell Douglas開發的另一款艦載版;後來因為AV-8B性能較好而被英國海軍採用並由Aerospace生產英國版的A ...
所以美帝不是抄
係自主研發



引用:
原帖由 cnfr 於 2020-8-11 02:29 PM 發表


係你講抄功課先咋,我哋咪遷就吓你嘅水平講吓囉。
係我就緊你地水平咋~



引用:
原帖由 cnfr 於 2020-8-11 02:32 PM 發表


炒機未必係關佢事喎,係人家撞過嚟之嘛。
炒咗就係炒咗
唔好雙重標準
and唔炒都係垃圾啦~



[隱藏]
引用:
原帖由 cnfr 於 2020-8-11 02:36 PM 發表


咁樣啦,邊個講先邊個就係畜牲,OK?
你地係咪得啲咁嘅小學雞嗌交邏輯?



[按此隱藏 Google 建議的相符內容]