• 瀏覽: 1,662
  • 回覆: 4
+4
Chicago-area manufacturer to lay off 150 people, move operations to Mexico, to avoid tariffs on Chinese metal

為躲避對中國金屬施加的關稅,芝加哥地區的製造商解僱了150人,並把業務搬到墨西哥




評論翻譯



PforPanchetta511
The worst part is, even after Orange Clown Dimwit Donnie is gone, these jobs usually never come back.

最糟糕的部分在於,即使那個橙色小丑傻瓜唐尼下台了,那些工作崗位通常也不會再回來。

letmeexplainitforyou
Oh it's far worse than that - the companies that establish businesses based on his changes in policy (such as removing restictions on something) can't just be moved away. If they establish an oil drilling rig, they have legal repercussions to being told that the law is changing and they can't drill now. Cleanup of this disaster will take far longer than most even presume now, which is about the only reason anyone sane would want Mueller to hurry up.

哦,事情比這要嚴重的多,那些由於他的政策改變(例如解除限制之類的)而建立業務的公司卻不能一走了之。如果他們建立了一座採油井,他們就會受到法律的影響,有人會告訴他們:法律變了,現在不能再採油了。清理這場災難所需要的時間,將遠遠超過大多數人現在的預期,這大概是理智的人希望米勒加快行動的唯一原因。

humanoideric
this tariff BS is the biggest and most blatantly incompetent thing trump has endorsed. I cant believe it hasnt sparked nationwide resistance -- its killings hundreds of real local and/or small businesses, every week.

這個關稅的胡說八道,是特朗普批准的最大最公然的無能的事。我不敢相信它竟然沒有引發全國性的反對,它每個星期都在扼殺成百上千的本地小型企業。






SpookyGeek
You were told a lot of things.

你聽說了很多事啊。

DonGrubius Texas
Wait. This isn’t winning?
/s

等等,我們不是正在勝利嗎?

MiasmaFate
I don’t think he was talking to us when he said that.

我覺得他說那句話的時候並不是給我們說的。

Edogawa1983
Putin seems to be doing really well.

普京似乎乾的相當不錯。

cromwest
That really sucks. They make metal safes so it's understandable that a tariff on metal would sink them. As someone that lives and works in Chicago I hate it when any company closes nearby. Wish we could do something about it but there isn't much to do when the federal government gets high off red pills and goes insane.

真是糟糕啊。他們製作金屬保險箱,所以對金屬的關稅會打擊他們,這一點不難理解。作為一個在芝加哥生活和工作的人,我討厭附近的任何公司關門。希望我們能為此做點什麼,但是在聯邦政府磕嗨了紅色小藥片並變的瘋狂的情況下,我們無能為力。

platypode
Vote. Get everyone you know to do the same. It's our best first step towards stopping the bleeding.

投票。讓你認識的每個人都做這件事。這是我們阻止流血的最佳的第一步。

Runnerphone
Sorry but no the fact is China undercuts everyone by selling for less then the raw materials cost it's been proven. China is a piece of[ shit ]trump is a piece of[ shit ]but this problem has been decades in the making by admins both sides mil ind you allowing China to dick over the us and other nations sad as it us what trump is doing should have been done years and years ago before it got as fucked as it is.

不好意思,我拒絕。事實是中國以低於原材料成本的價格出售產品的方式,傷害每個人,這是經過證實的。中國是一坨屎,特朗普也是一坨屎,但這個問題已經被雙方的政府醞釀了幾十年,你的做法是放任中國羞辱美國和其他國家,特朗普正在做的事情,很多年前就應該做了,結果它惡化到現在的地步。

cromwest
Yeah. But no one else is participating in this tarrif so China can just export to other western companies, putting ours at a disadvantage.
If you want to clamp down on China you need the WTO and huge trade agreements like the TPP otherwise we just[ fuck ]ourselves over like right now.

是啊,但沒有其他國家參與到這個關稅里,所以中國向其他西方公司出口產品就可以了,這會讓我們處於不利地位。
如果你想對中國施加壓力,你需要WTO和TPP之類的龐大的貿易協定,否則我們只能讓自己倒霉,就像現在。

skipperdude
If they really are dumping steel in the US, why don't people use the WTO rules to fight it? That is exactly the kind of thing the WTO handles.

如果他們真的在美國傾銷鋼鐵,為什麼人們不用WTO的規則進行打擊呢?這正是WTO應對的事情。

Happy_Heathan
This is exactly what the experts have been warning us about. The only people this is helping is the American steel industry.
The American steel industry can't keep up with the current demand in this country, so how is this going to help the average American company that requires steel and aluminum.
There is a global economy and we have to part of it, this America only stuff isn't a viable option and most individuals with a basic understanding of macro econimics should know that.

這正是專家們一直警告我們的事情。他們是唯一在幫助美國鋼鐵行業的人。
美國的鋼鐵行業不能滿足這個國家現有的需求,所以這種做法怎麼能幫助普通的需要鋼鐵和鋁的美國公司呢?
全球經濟是存在的,我們必須融入進去,這種美國自己玩的做法是行不通的,大多數對宏觀經濟有基本了解的人都應該知道這一點。

Damnwhiskey Illinois
About 25 years ago American steel could have walked through these orders. Look at what US Steel did in 96, when it folded and couldn't even pay it's employees self funded pensions as the CEO's walked away with millions. Look at the way China leveraged the market over the past 15 years and drove the price of steel into the ground with cheap labor and product. There should have been checks and tariffs put on these items then, and they weren't. Now with yet another aluminium mill down in Indiana, and talks of closing yet another steel plant, these factories have had no help. Due in part to greedy corporations and a declining skilled labor force.
What needs to happen now is a check in corporate profits and a bill introduced to promote investment within these companies on American soil. Get these factories back up and running with the latest technology, cleaner emissions, and a more productive layout and system. Paying these employees a decent living wage is a great incentive to keep qualified, smart plant hands who know thier systems inside and out. Unemployment is at it's lowest, manufacturing is fizzling but still booming, where is the money going? Now is the time to invest and buckle down and we are sitting stagnant.
This was kind of a tangent to help answer your question. I apologize.
As while it does not seem to be helping other manufacturing companies at the current moment, it lends a hand to American steel being able to build and supply a quality product and fix the labor shortage it's faced the last 30 years. If they can re-man and adapt to the current stress it should set up more American companies to be more prosperous as well as offering a cheaper rate to these companies in the future when the tariffs are inevitably rolled back.
One thing that had always boggled my mind is how steel can be made in China and shipped by boat, rail, and truck and can still be cheaper than a product made 25 miles away from where it is being installed.
Idk. Minus these companies closing on the short end and moving to Mexico, I think they should be given a break to stay, given an audit and if finances really are that tight given a break.. but on the other hand if there is still quite a bit of revenue coming in and they say thier broke and that they're leaving the country their products should be on the tariff list as well, meaning they will still be much less in demand.

25年前,美國的鋼鐵業還能完成這些訂單。看看美國鋼鐵業96年做了什麼,它倒閉了,連工人自己付錢的退休金都發不出來,而CEO們卻帶着數百萬美元拍屁股走人。看看中國過去15年是如何利用廉價勞動力和產品撬動市場,並讓鋼材價格跌入谷底。當時我們就應該對這些物品進行檢查,並徵收關稅,但事實並非如此。現在印第安納州又有一家鋁廠倒閉,又有一家鋼鐵廠即將關門,這些工廠沒有得到任何幫助。這種情況的部分原因是貪婪的大公司和不斷減少的熟練勞動力。

現在需要做的是核查大公司的利潤,並提出一項法案來促進這些公司在美國本土投資。讓這些工廠以最新的技術、更清潔的排放、更高效的布局和系統重新運轉起來。給這些員工一份體面的維持生活的工資,這是留住合格的、聰明的工廠工人的一大激勵,因為他們對自己的系統了如指掌。現在失業率處於最低水平,製造業在行將失敗,但仍在蓬勃發展,資金會流向何處?現在是投資和認真工作的時候了,而我們卻無所事事停滯不前。

這是為了幫助回答你的問題。我道歉。

雖然目前這種方法似乎無助於其他製造企業,但它有助於美國鋼鐵公司生產和供應高質量的產品,並解決了過去30年面臨的勞動力短缺問題。如果他們能重新補充人員,並適應當前的壓力,那就應該建立更多的美國公司,使其更加繁榮,並在未來關稅不可避免地降低時,為這些公司提供更便宜的價格。
有一件事一直困擾着我,那就是在中國製造,通過船隻、鐵路和卡車運輸到這裡的鋼鐵,怎麼會比25英里以外的工廠製造的產品還要便宜。
我不知道。如果這些公司短期內將關門,並遷往墨西哥,我認為他們應該先停工一段時間,留下來接受審計,如果財政真的那麼緊張,那就停工。但另一方面,如果仍然有相當多的收入,他們說他們破產了,他們要離開這個國家,那麼他們的產品也應被納入關稅列表,這樣他們的需求仍然會少得多。

Runnerphone
It's cheaper because China cheats honestly. Profits aren't that important to Chinese companies when they don't control a market steel for example was shown years ago to be sold for less then you could buy the raw materials in China for. Why? Because the gov will accept the loss for their companies to push others out of a market and take it over. As you said this[ shit ]show should have been dealt with decades ago. People also don't get that free trade is a scam when it comes to China and mexico. Free trade is ment to allow free flow of goods between nations for the us EU and Japan it works why? Because the standard of living is high enough for said people to buy each others products. China and Mexico for example the average wage is to low for most people to afford US EU or Japanese goods. NAFTA for examples biggest use was for us companies to close us operations move to mexico for cheaper labor and send stuff back to the us.

老實說,中國的產品更便宜是因為中國在欺騙。當中國公司沒有控制鋼鐵市場,利潤對他們沒有那麼重要,就像幾年前那樣,他們的產品價格在中國比原材料還便宜。為什麼?因為ZF會接受那些公司的損失,這樣就可以把其他人趕出市場,並全面接管。就像你說的,這種事情幾十年前就應該處理。人們也沒有明白,在面臨中國和墨西哥的時候,自由貿易也變成了騙局。自由貿易的本意是讓產品在美國、歐盟和日本這些國家之間自由的流動,那樣它才管用,為什麼?因為這些國家的生活標準足夠高,可以讓這些國家的人們購買彼此的產品。以中國和墨西哥為例,他們的平均公司太低了,所以大部分人買不起美國、歐盟和日本的產品。而北美自由貿易區的最大作用就是讓我們的公司關掉美國的業務,搬到墨西哥尋找更廉價的勞動力,把產品賣回美國。

skipperdude
You say you like capitalism, but there are so many anti-capitalist ideas in there it's sad.

你說你喜歡資本主義,但這麼多點子都是反資本主義的,真可悲。

Damnwhiskey Illinois
I don't think I uttered that statement once. I'm for a thriving business to where all workers are held in high regard and paid well for thier services. All while maintaining a competitive and quality product. My comment backs up that notion. The only place where you could even say I had anti-capitalist ideals is where I had mentioned that when China tanked the steel industry, there should have been tariffs leveraged from the beginning to even out the market. Also with providing incentives for these businesses with a high profit gain to be pushed towards investing into the company and employees themselves, rather than stock buybacks and bank accounts. If you could take the time and provide me with more information to back up your comment, that would be great.

我覺得我沒說過那種話。我支持業務欣欣向榮,讓所有勞動者的工作獲得尊重和良好的報酬。同時保持產品的競爭力和質量。我的評論也支持這種宗旨。唯一一個可能被你說成是“反資本主義”的地方在於,我提到當中國打敗我們的鋼鐵業,我們一開始就應該利用關稅來讓市場回歸公平。此外,通過激勵這些獲得高額利潤的企業投資於公司和員工本身,而不是股票回購和銀行賬戶。如果你能抽出時間給我提供更多的信息來支持你的評論,那就太好了。






BaryMccockner
Not good.

不好。

Blastgirl69
I wonder, are Republicans tired of winning and "Making America Great Again". This does not help American people at all.

我很好奇,共和黨是否厭煩了“勝利”和“讓美國再次偉大”。這種做法根本無助於美國老百姓。

ph33randloathing
No one knew that winning would suck so much.

當時沒人知道勝利會這麼糟糕。

smagmite
Whew, I'm getting tired of all this winning.

口哨,我厭煩了這種勝利。

sexrobot_sexrobot
There are so many industries like this in this part of the country, where most of the manufacturing base has already relocated but the specialist parts have been left behind. It doesn't take much for them to go.

美國我們這裡有很多這種工廠,而他們大部分的製造基地都已經搬走了,但專業部分被留在這裡。他們要走也不費多大的事。

jarjarbinx
didn't know a place like Wakanda exist in Chicago, and they make gun storage vaults.

我不知道芝加哥還有類似瓦坎達的地方,他們還有武器庫呢。

bmak1187
“Dey tuuukk rrrr jerbbbs”

“他們搶走了我們的工作!”

Hiccup
This is how you win a trade war! Send the jobs away!

這就是你們贏得貿易戰的方式!把工作崗位送走!


SintharTrading
Still waiting for the trade wars are good and easy to win to happen....

“貿易戰是好事,很容易打贏”,我還在等着呢……

mkvgtired
The irony is that some workers will be given the option to move to El Paso so they can commute to the factory...in Mexico.

諷刺的是,有些工人還有個選擇,就是搬到厄爾巴索(美國德州城市),這樣他們就可以坐通勤車去工廠上班……工廠在墨西哥。

treemister1
"what is your purpose of visiting"
"I'm going to work Greg, just like yesterday"
"Don't be a snide asshat Bill, this is my job as ridiculous as this part of it is"

“你來這裡的目的是什麼?”
“跟昨天一樣啊,Greg,我是來上班的。”
“別騙人了,Bill,這是我的工作,雖然說起來很荒謬。”

PParker46
All wars have casualties, often enough for the survivors on the ground to say it was not worth it. But then there are others flying at 40.000 feet and from that level they can just announce winning and even convince themselves that it's true.

所有戰爭都會有傷亡,通常足夠讓地上的倖存者們說戰爭不值得。但是也有人在4萬英尺的高空飛翔,那個層次的人會宣布勝利,甚至能說服自己事實就是這樣。

futurefiresUptown
I dislike Trump as well but let's not be so ignorant as to think the tariffs are the primary reason this company is moving MORE (that's right they already have operations in Mexico) to Mexico.

It's just another excuse for corporate execs to cost cut.

我也不喜歡特朗普,但我們不要過於無知,以為關稅是這家公司進一步搬往墨西哥的主要原因,是的,他們早已在墨西哥開展生產了。

Parasamgate
So Trump's trade war gave them cover to move? Guess we will be seeing more of this then.

所以特朗普的貿易戰給他們的搬遷打了掩護?那麼我覺得我們會見證更多這種事。

futurefiresUptown
It gives them an excuse to blame someone else as to why they are moving but they would have moved anyway.
"The company already has a plant in China and another in Mexico, and its only U.S. factories were the two in the Chicago area, Fletcher said"

這給他們了一個借口,可以把他們搬走的原因推到別人身上,但是他們原本就準備搬走的。
“Fletcher說,這家公司已經在中國有了一家工廠,在墨西哥還有一個,在美國僅剩的工廠就是芝加哥地區的那兩個。”

alot_the_murdered
I'm sure there are a great many examples, but a niche PC case manufacturer did the same thing a couple weeks ago. They went bankrupt and blamed the tariffs, but the reality is that they did a shit job running their business and were going to go bankrupt anyways.
It's an easy scapegoat and doesn't harm the company's reputation as much as "we moved these factories to Mexico so we could get richer".

我肯定有很多例子,但一家個人電腦機箱製造商幾周前做了同樣的事。他們破產了,並且責怪關稅,但實際上他們的業務做的一塌糊塗,無論如何都是要破產的。
“我們把那些工廠搬到墨西哥,這樣我們就能發點財”,這種說法是輕而易舉的替罪羊,也不會傷害公司的名譽。

MAGNIFICAT_MAFIAWest Town
The headline blamed the tariffs, but in reality they were only a small contributing factor

標題責怪關稅,但實際上關稅只是很小的因素。

guitarguy1685
I'm sure a bigger part of it is cheap cheap labor force in Mexico.

我肯定更大的因素在於墨西哥的人力資源要便宜得多。






SinkHoleDeMayo
Funny enough, subsidizing US made goods are far more effective than tariffs on foreign goods.

真好笑,補貼美國製造的商品要比對外國商品徵收關稅有效得多。

kryppla
subsidy is a bad word! Unless it's to offset one of your own stupid policies.

補貼是個不好的詞彙!除非它是為了彌補你國自己的某項愚蠢政策。

Silidon
Or for fossil fuels. Need to make sure they stay super profitable so that we’re not picking winners in the energy sector.

或者是化石燃料。需要讓他們保持超級盈利的狀態,這樣我們就不用在能源領域選擇贏家了。

ButDidYouCryNear West Side
Thank you Trump!

謝謝你特朗普!

futurefiresUptown
Wake up, Trump is not the reason they are moving to Mexico, they are using him to soften the blow to their rep.
You think Trump is the reason this company already moved much of its operations to Mexico years ago?
Don't be so ignorant. Disclaimer I hate Trump too but I don't jump on every bullshit nonsense news story to fit my agenda while continuing to peddle false narratives.
The problem with BOTH sides right now is that they only want the truth if it fits their agenda, it's truly sad how this is defining our lives right now.

醒醒吧,特朗普才不是他們搬到墨西哥的原因,他們只是利用他來減輕對他們的打擊。
你們認為特朗普是原因?這家公司幾年前就把大部分生產搬到墨西哥了好伐?
別傻了。聲明一下,我也討厭特朗普,但我不會把每一條胡說八道的新聞都牽強附會,來推進我的議程,同時繼續兜售虛假的說法。
現在雙方的問題是,他們只想要那些符合他們議程的事實,真的很悲哀,這就是我們當今生活的定義方式。

fightinihoptypebeat
So why else would they be moving to Mexico than for a cheaper cost of materials for operations? Genuinely curious, because that part seems to be left out.

他們搬到墨西哥的原因,除了追求更廉價的原材料用於生產,還有別的原因嗎?我很好奇,因為這部分似乎被忽略了。

alot_the_murdered
Cheaper labor. Fewer labor regulations. Probably fewer regulations in general.

廉價勞動力。勞動法律比較少。法規可能普遍比較少。

Neverdied
The point is still that Chicago and the US is going to lose those jobs to another country BECAUSE of tariffs imposed BY Trump. The fault is still on Trump no matter if the company had hedged their bets. Without tariffs who is to say they would not have stayed here or used their presence for management etc... I don t know and you don t know
End of story is jobs are leaving following tariffs hence Trump is to blame.

關鍵依然在於,芝加哥和美國將會失去那些工作崗位,流失到另一個國家,這都是因為特朗普實施的關稅。這個鍋依然是特朗普的,無論那家公司是否做了兩手準備。如果沒有關稅,誰敢說他們不會留在這裡,或者利用現有人員進行管理?我不知道,你也不知道。
歸根結底,先是關稅,然後這些工作崗位流失了,所以還是要怪特朗普。

makotech222
Just a thought for everyone here. If this business was completely owned by their workers, would they all collectively decide to move their own jobs away to Mexico?

請諸位想一想。如果這些業務完全歸那些工人所有,他們會集體決定把自己的工作崗位搬到墨西哥嗎?

Wooly_Willy
Probably not, but that also doesn't mean they could continue to operate with large raw material increases on the horizon. It was likely already unprofitable as a plant, and this was just the death knell. Plants get closed for a variety of reasons, but they will not operate at a loss just for the sake of jobs.

可能不會,但這並不是意味着他們能繼續運作下去,因為原材料漲價迫在眉睫。它作為一家工廠,很有可能已經不再賺錢,所以關稅只不過是一記喪鐘。工廠關門的原因多種多樣,但他們肯定不會僅僅為了一些工作崗位而繼續運作下去。

makotech222
You're missing the point. If the workers owned the business, they could still be paid a salary, even if the profit was 0. If it was less, they could decrease their salaries to stay afloat. Both of which are immensely preferable to just closing shop.

To a capitalist, if the business isn't making >5% profit, then they will just sell off and try something else, without regards to anyone working there.

你沒說到點子上。如果工人們擁有這項業務,他們依然能拿到工資,即使利潤為零。即使利潤比較少,他們也可以少拿一點工資繼續維持下去。這兩種情況都比關門大吉要好得多。
對於資本家而言,如果生意的利潤不到5%,他們就會賣掉業務,並且嘗試別的東西,根本不會估計任何在那裡工作的人。

Tr1pline
If you're at a dead end job and would rather take a pay cut then yes.

如果你的工作沒有出路,而且寧願減薪,那麼可以。

aspenbordr
Yes, they still would decide to do this.
100 workers paying themselves $5 each per year on a business that generates a total of $500/year in revenues. So no profit after they pay themselves. Fully owned equally by the 100 workers.
Now, if, instead, the workers can replace themselves with Mexican workers for $2/hour, now the business costs $200/year to run and generates $300/year in profits.
Each worker now gets a share of the $300/year for doing nothing anymore (they outsourced), so that's $3 per year. They then find another job that pays them $5 (or heck, $4, or even $3) and they're better off than they were before.

是的,他們依然會決定這樣做。
假設有100名工人運行一門生意,每年支付他們自己每人5美元,這門生意每年的總收入為500美元。所以當他們給自己發工資後,就沒有利潤可言。假設這門生意完全由這100名工人平均所有。
現在如果這些工人把他們自己替換成墨西哥工人,每人只需要2美元,這樣這門生意每年的成本就是200美元,可以創造300美元的例如。
每個工人現在可以分享這300美元,而且什麼都不用做(他們把工作外包了),所以每年可以賺3美元。然後他們可以找一份5美元的工作(甚至4美元或者3美元),這樣他們的生活就會比過去更好。

shakeszilla
Where do these magical factories exist with zero operating costs, debts, and other expenditures?

哪裡有這麼神奇的工廠?運行成本、債務和其他開支都為零?

s1300045
Yeah... I get what you are saying, and I 100% agree with everything. I just want to share a thought, my pessimistic view.
What we are describing here is already a case study. It's called the pension fund or a 401k. Workers save up a portion of their salary to invest or "buy" a slice of the company. So one day the worker can "retire" and live off of the piece of company he/she owns...
I really like that idea, but that honestly didn't work a lot of people. Especially during 2008. So many people got screwed over... The people that are supposed to manage the fund did a terrible job. So many people lost their pensions. I was fresh out of college during that time, and I worked on projects for those big banks to "help" companies liquidate their pension liabilities. Those long time employees really got screwed over. It was bad.
I don't have a better solution. I have a 401k because there is nothing better out there. I am lucky enough to live a debt free lifestyle and achieve FIRE, but I understand that is not possible for a lot of people...
Some people are just dealt with a shitty hand, man. Some of them are truly fucked by their circumstances.

好吧,我明白你說的話了,而且我完全同意。我只想分享一些我的思考,悲觀的看法。
我們在這裡描述的已經是一個研究案例。它被稱為養老基金或401k。工人們把工資的一部分存起來投資,或者“購買”公司的一部分。這樣將來有一天,工人可以“退休”,靠他/她擁有的公司份額生活……

我真的很喜歡這個想法,但老實說,它並沒有對太多人起作用。特別是在2008年。很人被騙了……負責管理該基金的人幹得很糟糕。許多人失去了養老金。那段時間我剛從大學畢業,我為那些大銀行“幫助”企業清償養老金債務的項目工作。那些工齡長的員工真的被搞得很慘。這種做法不好。

我也沒有更好的解決方案。我有一份401k,因為沒有更好的選擇了。我很幸運,過着沒有債務的生活方式,並實現了,但我知道對很多人來說這種做法不可能實現……
有些人只是碰到了糟糕的人。有些人則被他們的環境搞慘了。

PhysicsMan12
It's hard to say. They either would all move to Mexico to keep their business profitable, or they would have to close their doors and start a new business. The article stated the operation of the business isn't profitable with the tariffs in place. So if the workers all owned the business they would either have to move to make it profitable again, or move into a new business area.

很難說。他們或者把生意全部搬到墨西哥來保持盈利能力,或者被迫不關門,並開始一份新的生意。這篇文章說,當關稅啟動,運行這項生意已經變得無利可圖。所以如果這個生意是全體工人共同所有,那麼他們或者被迫搬走保持盈利,或者進入新的商業領域。

CriticalandPragmatic
Still undecided if the change in pay structure would help keep it here if it were employee owned

如果是這個生意是工人所有,薪酬結構的改變是否有助於維持業務,依然很難說。







greenpeppercorns
I see what you’re doing and I like it

我明白你在做的事情,我很喜歡。

deus-inter-homines
If it was worker owned they'd be out of business within 2 years just like every other failure that's tried this idea .

如果是員工持股,他們會像其他所有試過這種想法並失敗的公司一樣,在兩年內倒閉。

EnochChicagoIrving
No

不會。

kingchilifrito
Presumably they could get another job somewhere so yes, they'd move to cut labor costs.

我猜測他們會在別的什麼地方找到另一份工作,所以是的,他們的搬遷會降低勞動力成本。

PMnewb
Probably not, because it would require all of them uprooting their lives.

Pretty much the only multinational corporations with an employee-owned structure are engineering and construction firms, because they can operate worldwide with just a few employees actually located in the country where the work is being performed.

可能不是,因為這需要他們所有人的生活被連根拔起。
工程和建築公司可能是唯一具有員工持股結構的跨國公司,因為他們只需要少數僱員真正出現在實施工作的國家,就可以實現全球運作。

JamalChic
Trickle down south economics.

涓滴經濟流向南方。

dave_312
"The company already has a plant in China and another in Mexico, and its only U.S. factories were the two in the Chicago area, Fletcher said. "

Sounds like the only thing the tariffs did was impact timing...

聽起來關稅帶來的唯一影響就是倒計時……

ooo-ooo-oooyea
Nothing more american than Safes

沒有什麼比保險箱更美國的了。

fightinihoptypebeat
True but it’s not like those drawing upsides haven’t always been present for decades... there had to have been either a singular or multiple factors that pushed them over the edge and made them decide to outsource operations. Considering the political climate and how dumb these tariffs are getting this was likely the last straw. Outrage media likes to point at Trump for so many things but for some reason the very present effects of the trade war go unnoticed, which is ironic because it’s one of his few policy decisions.

沒錯,但並不是說那些上升趨勢幾十年來就沒有出現過……一定有一個或多個因素把他們推到懸崖邊,讓他們決定把業務外包。考慮到政治氣候以及這些關稅的愚蠢程度,它們可能是最後一根稻草。憤怒的媒體喜歡把很多事情的矛頭指向特朗普,但出於某種原因,貿易戰目前的影響卻變得默默無聞,這很諷刺,因為這是特朗普所做的為數不多的政策決定之一。

pentakiller19
Are we winning yet?

我們還沒贏嗎?

kingchilifrito
A tariff is a tax on commerce, just like a tax is a tax on commerce. Illinois has a lot of taxes but nobody's jimmies seem to be ruffled by that.

關稅是一種商業稅,跟普通的商業稅沒什麼兩樣。伊利諾伊州有很多的稅種,然而沒有一個人對那些稅大驚小怪。

abmac
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

打愚蠢的遊戲,贏得愚蠢的獎品(自作自受)。

the_disco_pimp
fuck that company, us steel is just down the road

那家公司真操蛋,過一段時間美國的鋼鐵就造出來了。

patrick_fungo
#winning

勝利。



[隱藏]
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
[按此隱藏 Google 建議的相符內容]