• 瀏覽: 1,098
  • 回覆: 2


20100613

http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2010-06-13/0909596852.html




資料圖:中國正在改造中的瓦良格號航母


本報特約記者 雷 炎

  美國“防務談話”網站6月10日報導稱,最近中國海軍的航母計畫似乎有了兩大重要進展:除了一座與真實航母幾乎相同的水泥建築在武漢建成並安裝雷達外,被稱為“殲-15”的艦載戰鬥機也進行了試飛。文章還稱,一向謹慎的中國軍方有意無意地向外界透露航母專案動態,似乎是為了“滿足西方的好奇心”。
  
        據報導,出現在武漢中國艦船設計研究中心新區的特殊建築是一座“混合了普通辦公樓與大型航母上層設施的複合體”,這在美國早有先例。當年美國海軍在新澤西州莫爾斯敦修建了一座“麥田裏的巡洋艦”,這座停泊在麥田裏的水泥“巡洋艦”承擔了測試“宙斯盾”系統的重任,為之後“宙斯盾”上艦打下堅實基礎。

  曾在蘇聯海軍服役20年的俄退役海軍上校布伊斯特洛夫認為,武漢的“水泥航母建築”全尺寸仿照了中國早年從烏克蘭購買的“瓦良格”號航母的艦島,屬於航母設施的精確拷貝版。他解釋說,在一艘航母的建造過程中,中國海軍必須考慮許多細微的技術差別,尤其是涉及艦島艙室尺寸的複雜計算以及雷達電子設備的安裝調試,再加上內部不同用途電纜的鋪設,都需要建立同比例的模型進行試驗。他認為,上述工作都有必要建設“陸地航母”作為試驗平臺,用來實地驗證航母設計的諸多技術問題,如航母基本佈局、艦載機尺寸測量、航母內部佈線、機庫大小設置、艦載武器佈置、雷達電子設備測試等。從現有已披露的照片顯示,“水泥航母”的甲板上有一架用起重機吊上去的大型飛機模型。

  布伊斯特洛夫認為,“水泥航母”上最醒目的艦島採用了中國海軍標準的灰色塗裝,並在艦島前上方搭建了與中國海軍052B型驅逐艦相同的全封閉桅杆結構,加裝了類似的雷達天線,這似乎表明建造者的真正用意是搭建一個航母測試平臺,用於評估電子設備的安裝位置與電磁相容性能,這些都是需要進行實物擺放和實際開機測試才能獲得的珍貴技術資料。

  文章稱,中國航母工程的另一大進展便是瀋陽飛機製造公司研製的“殲-15”艦載機已實現首飛,目前正進入新測試。據報導,該機是在打敗中國成都飛機製造公司提出的“殲-14”艦載機方案後問世的,外界認為沈飛在開發過程中吸取了俄制蘇-33艦載機的設計理念,因為“殲-15”擁有與蘇-33相同的折疊機翼、雙前輪起落架和一對尺寸很大的鴨式前翼。據俄羅斯《生意人報》稱,中國沈飛在去年10月就完成首架“殲-15”原型機的生產,11月開始進行折疊機翼的收放試驗。據稱,“殲-15”下一步將可能送到陝西閻良中國試飛院進行試飛,屆時中國是否會選擇來自海軍航空兵的飛行員進行試飛值得關注。考慮到“殲-15”上艦的特殊需要,中國海軍航空兵必然要建立自己的試飛中心,因此“殲-15”要全面結束試飛將是一個漫長的過程。

  “防務談話”網站認為,武漢“水泥航母”的建成,以及“殲-15”完成首飛,可能暗示中國航母的發展速度遠超出外界估計,即已從概念設計階段進入工程設計的最後階段,而航母的配套子系統更是進入實際測試階段。由於武漢“水泥航母”不能對所有子系統進行測試,因此中國軍方可能在其他地方建有類似測試平臺,以便對航母將要採用的聲吶、動力、艦載武器等進行全面測試。

  (《環球時報》2010年06月11日 第08版)

  《環球時報》版權作品,未經書面授權,嚴禁轉載,違者將被追究法律責任。



Be tolerant, you gain harm & peace.
Be humble, you reach new horizon.
http://www.defencetalk.com/chine ... rier-program-26836/

Navy News — By Forecast International on June 9, 2010 at 5:28 am

NEWTOWN, Conn.:- The Chinese Navy's aircraft carrier program appears to be picking up momentum with Chinese news sources reporting two major steps forward in the development of the necessary systems for these ships.

The most remarkable of these steps is the construction of what appears to be a hybrid of an office building and an aircraft carrier. This has already been dubbed the "Carrier in the Cornfield" in reference to the famous U.S. Naval Surface Warfare "Cruiser in the Cornfield" facility at Moorestown, NJ. The New Jersey facility was used to test out the AEGIS air warfare system and subsequently provided a research capability to test new items of equipment under carefully controlled conditions. It is likely that the Chinese facility is intended for similar work.

Aircraft and helicopters are frequently seen on the roof of this building. It appears that current efforts are aimed at developing the operational art needed for on-deck operations and flow, and then on training PLAN personnel in these functions. It also appears that the dummy superstructure on the roof of this facility is being used to test the phased-array radars being developed for the new carriers. It can be assumed that the facility is also being used to check for electromagnetic interference between the radar and the aircraft. One thing can safely be assumed - the Chinese are not landing aircraft on the roof of the building. The aircraft there are being lifted into position by a crane.

The other new development is based on reports that Shenyang is designing a new J-15 naval fighter, possibly using technologies from its next-generation fighter bid for J-14, which appears to have been rejected in favor of Chengdu's design. Whether this is a development of the Su-33 (one example of which was reportedly purchased from Ukraine in 2001) or a completely new design is unknown.

A J-15 prototype was seen parked at the Shenyang Aircraft Corporation airfield in May 2010, revealing its arresting hook retracted beneath the redesigned tailcone, enlarged folding wings, strengthened landing gears with twin nosewheels, and a pair of small canard foreplanes to improve its low-speed handling.

These developments suggest that the CPLAN is very serious about establishing a carrier-based aviation arm. The degree of research that is under way speaks of a well-planned and systematic approach to developing an indigenous carrier force.

The more interesting question is, why have the Chinese allowed this information to appear at this time? It is most unlikely they did so to satisfy the curiosity of Western naval analysts. A more likely hypothesis is that there is conflict between those who see the Chinese fleet as a primarily coastal defense force and those who envision a more assertive power projection role.

For the last few years, the former group has appeared to dominate the debate, with Chinese major surface combatant construction slowed to a crawl while the building of frigates and fast attack craft has accelerated.

Releasing information on carrier design and development may well be a ploy to use Western reaction to these programs as a way of motivating the Chinese authorities into increasing support for the carrier program.



我認為文章認為的進度慢了。


[按此隱藏 Google 建議的相符內容]