1.) You are side-tracking on the argument here...... my original argument was the Chinese Law itself was unjust...... so your point of the CCP "acting according to law" is simply flawed.....
2.) Throughout this discussion you have been implying that the CCP was compelled to yield and use extreme force...... thats why you keep emphasisng on the wrongs of the students...... What I believe is, did all the students/ public who were murdered committed wrongdoing? What about proportionality (Did they deserve to be executed, were they tried) ?
b.) Look at the Canadian video you showed me (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyj-3S_ulvI&feature=related) .... look at the no. of the wounded....... firing into the shy caused all those...... (besides I think manslaughter is an executable offence in China anyway isn't it?)
c.) again the video you showed me..... I think the tank/ armoured personnel carrier was firing.... look at 2:45 to 2:47.....
3.) No thats quite different...... You don't seem to quite understand the principle of justice....... for example, 5 robbers went to rob a bank, 6 people were accused of being part of the deed and were killed on site..... 2 of them were innocent.... does the fact that one of the robbers escaped mean it is OK to kill that 2 innocent people?
With that kind of attitude towards justice..... frankly.... you will feel right at home in mainland China....
4.) After Chan made his comment, the committee of SU made a joint statement.... stating Chan's view does not represent them or the SU.... that's a clear violation of collective responsibility......how else would you call it?
1.) You are side-tracking on the argument here...... my original argument was the Chinese Law itself was unjust...... so your point of the CCP "acting according to law" is simply flawed.....
1.) You are side-tracking on the argument here...... my original argument was the Chinese Law itself was unjust...... so your point of the CCP "acting according to law" is simply flawed.....
1.) You are side-tracking on the argument here...... my original argument was the Chinese Law itself was unjust...... so your point of the CCP "acting according to law" is simply flawed.....
中國法律如何 unjust..... how can a socialist legal system be just in the area of public law? (which dictates the relationship between the state and the people)
咁大型咁多人的暴動唔處理......So you actually disagree with 古靈仔 since even he said "不認同以高殺傷力鎮壓".....
公義是包括了對學生殺軍人不用被審判嗎.... thats exactly what I said !!! The students didnt even have a chance to be tried.... they were executed on site. I said the students deserved to be tried (undergo the due process..... if such thing exist in China) before they were killed by the state. That's why I oppose the CCP's action.
中國法律如何 unjust..... how can a socialist legal system be just in the area of public law? (which dictates the relationship between the state and the people)
公義是包括了對學生殺軍人不用被審判嗎.... thats exactly what I said !!! The students didnt even have a chance to be tried.... they were executed on site. I said the students deserved to be tried ...
The students didnt even have a chance to be tried.... they were executed on site
/https://www.discuss.com.hk/attachments/day_240418/20240418_0d436206ecaa2bfcd6feMEaoGLslvYRH.jpeg)
/https://www.discuss.com.hk/attachments/day_240418/20240418_dc77f2f2211dc0594f17cRGRRV3SVV31.jpeg)
/https://www.discuss.com.hk/attachments/day_240418/20240418_85fcbc4561458f62adbcBUVNa8UfAPXk.jpeg)
/https://www.discuss.com.hk/attachments/day_240418/20240418_7ebb5f2a21898db6d3c7l4CTd734k72S.png)
/https://www.discuss.com.hk/attachments/day_240418/20240418_792ccd9a662ec45eb120VbjNnd2qI3dK.jpeg)
/https://www.discuss.com.hk/attachments/day_240418/20240418_3bb5af66a58191f0ffe6sheHWxgd5uBV.jpeg)
/https://www.discuss.com.hk/attachments/day_240418/20240418_761df8395a384a1300edEyDE11yHX2Np.jpeg)
