I think you should not say comment on other " opponents" who just expressed their different thoughts, if you did not express your single word on this topic here since Sep.
這 個 typical "Trial & Error Ruling System" 要10億人受貧苦災難30年當白老鼠, 活於各派領袖間political movement,並通過武力鬥爭各抓佔杈力, 冇數家破人亡,冇數假案冤案, 最終要待毛死後,及要by luck 葉帥也同意Deng's 當時中國經濟發展出路名句: 不管黑貓白貓, 能捉老鼠便是好貓, 最後used forces 拉4人幫, 並排除毛追隨者左王鄧力群, 才能推翻毛式共產代價. 中國今天經濟小康(Ginni還有55~60) 這是Eric Li 講日本Fukuyama 先生的 中國政杈來自self-authoritarianism, I think it was not applicable or success WHEN these formidable leaders, Deng and Ye did not exist. 其實這個所謂self-authoritarianism, Deng & Ye是通過武力奪杈, self-authoritarianism絕對是自授杈力, 行政主導, 不受人民監督, good or evil ; 多貪,少貪或冇貪, all are depended on quality of leaders, whereas Democracy system 用voting & election選賢, . 人民授權 "empowerment"治國.
當然Democracy 也不是萬能, 看low degree of literacy 的India and Philipines, 會多左因惰,因毒之貧. 這 system 不靠領導人, 杈力不能獨攬,少些腐, 較保險,平庸者頂多做一屆.
Eric X Li here doesn't object the democracy system, and he just emphasizes China can achieve its goals達至大同 as the ultimate goal by using different ways---i.e. of skipping voting and election mechanism. 但我認為這路易產生貪腐問題, Eric X Li 說有考核選賢成top leaders of the nation嚴密機制和組織, 但看來這還漏洞處處, in the central commitee中有大貪官,風化敗德,殺人領袖不斷被抽出送法院. Good or evil, be the leaders' quality !
中國今天經濟小康(Ginni還有55~60) 這是Eric Li 講日本Fukuyama 先生的 中國政杈來自self-authoritarianism, I think it was not applicable or success WHEN these formidable leaders, Deng and Ye did not exist. 其實這個所謂self-authoritarianism, Deng & Ye是通過武力奪杈, self-authoritarianism絕對是自授杈力, 行政主導, 不受人民監督, good or evil ; 多貪,少貪或冇貪, all are depended on quality of leaders, whereas Democracy system 用voting & election選賢, . 人民授權 "empowerment"治國.
當然Democracy 也不是萬能, 看low degree of literacy 的India and Philipines, 會多左因惰,因毒之貧. 這 system 不靠領導人, 杈力不能獨攬,少些腐, 較保險,平庸者頂多做一屆.
Eric X Li here doesn't object the democracy system, and he just emphasizes China can achieve its goals達至大同 as the ultimate goal by using different ways---i.e. of skipping voting and election mechanism.
但我認為這路易產生貪腐問題, Eric X Li 說有考核選賢成top leaders of the nation嚴密機制和組織, 但看來這還漏洞處處, in the central commitee中有大貪官,風化敗德,殺人領袖不斷被抽出送法院. Good or evil, be the leaders' quality !
擁槍 = 人權是寫到美國憲法上的: 第2條, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." 所以, 美國聯邦政府要全面禁槍, 一定要從憲法入手, 以憲法逼各州份跟從 - 但現時在美國基本上不可能。中國把憲法重寫十遍, 美國恐怕只能改上一句。美國對上一次修憲是1992年, 這條憲法(第27條)用了200百年才修訂下來。這當然誇張了一點, 但再上兩次修憲已經是1971和1967年。
中國的精英互選制度; 亦可能felons相互包涵, who knows ! 看溥某成功上到中常委, 若當權,真可怕!
這framework下, 一生精明leaders偶爾出錯易做成災難性的政策, 萬劫不復! 只悼念胡耀邦, 和complained官倒變大災難,傷人民感情. 難道美式民主制度之下就沒有? Mismanagement 一定有,但有不致命, i.e. Water Gate scandle. Enron Audit Scandal, finally safe guarded by Sarbanes-Oxley Act. 中國重寫了多少次憲法. Law and constitution must be amended/revised relentlessly over the time, it is a normal practice as well as HK and other nations doing. Most important if they are being worked/used in forces, and interpretated properly by law courts and judges, who mustn't be bribed, and must be applicable on top leaders and lords of communist who would not be excepted. 你憑什麼說美式民主較「保險」? 美式民主在槍械案中保了些什麼險? Grafting a flower on a tree!I think you must not make reasoning to support China by tricking US free firearm policy(The US Gun Laws) directly relating to a democracy system in a bundle. Or I may also send you these information in return http://www.who.int/gho/road_safety/mortality/traffic_deaths_number/en/ The traffic accident death toll in China shared the world total 20%, is it really a rubbish rulling system, or China people do not qualify in owning and driving their cars?
原帖由 布佬 於 2016-11-16 12:10 PM 發表
... Enron Audit Scandal, finally safe guarded by Sarbanes-Oxley Act...
... to support China by tricking US free firearm policy(The US Gun Laws) directly relating to a democracy system in a bundle....
Sarbanes-Oxley 經美國聯邦議院通過, 用以防止了上市公司造數 - 這是美式民主功勞
US Gun Control Law, 同樣經美國各州議院通過, 卻無效防止潛在罪犯拿槍犯案, 而且問題還愈來愈嚴重 - 這就不關美式民主事了
香港一直是全國學習的榜樣,國家仍然希望未來香港在民主、法治方面,能夠「先行先試」,但他特別提醒,如果七百三十萬人都搞不好民主,怎能期望十四億人民能搞好民主
- E段重癈話,唔該你過去深圳河北問下有冇人以香港作為學習的榜樣?作為假想敵就大把。你想香港有"民主、法治",咁唔該高抬貴手啦!唔該張德肛之流,shut the fxxk up 啦!七百三十萬人都搞不好民主,你唔問係點解,就賴香港人做得唔好,但就冇問自己有冇做過火位。