• 瀏覽: 3,586
  • 回覆: 14
澳洲(航母)直登附跳板服役了!

勁!大!資料如下。


作救災no problem.

打仗無潛艇押陣,矮了一截!


有船內部片段
www.skynews.com.au/news/national/2014/11/28/hmas-canberra-commissioned.html


二,

www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2014/11/26/australias-largest-ever-navy-ship-set-join-fleet



引用

The 27,000 【27000頓】ton war machine had a crew of 400水手 but could carry and sustain 1100全副武裝士兵 fully equipped infantry troops.

It would also do the Army and the Navy’s heavy lifting, able to carry 110貨車,裝甲車,包括阿伯汗坦克 trucks and armoured vehicles up to and including Abrams main battle tanks.

It could house 可容納18 架直升機helicopters and up to最高八架中型直升機可在六個甲版上的升降點同時操作 eight medium lift choppers would be able to operate simultaneously from six landing points on the flight deck.






www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2014 ... ship-set-join-fleet




www.skynews.com.au/news/national ... a-commissioned.html


官網

[url][/www.hmascanberra.com/history/nushipcanberra.htmlurl]






引用:
原帖由 風中老叔 於 2014-11-28 09:54 PM 發表
澳洲(航母)直登附跳板服役了!

勁!大!資料如下。


作救災no problem.

打仗無潛艇押陣,矮了一截!


有船內部片段
www.skynews.com.au/news/national/2014/11/28/hmas-canberra-commissione ...
自從墨爾本號輕航母退役後, 澳洲海軍等一塊甲板等了差不多三十年......



我怕呢條船會有麻煩。。。。。
。。。。多故障,,,,






[隱藏]
引用

美國現役陸軍中校兼
袋鼠戰略學院訪問學者,
Lieutenant Colonel Jan K. Gleiman is an active duty US Army officer and a visiting fellow at ASPI from United States Pacific Command. These are his personal views. Image courtesy of Department of Defence.。


www.aspistrategist.org.au/a-big- ... hibious-capability/

The LHD is a helicopter-centric ship. Its flight deck is big, but its dock is small compared to US or UK amphibious ships, and it will normally carry only four small landing craft. But the landing-force order of battle is vehicle-centric.  Will the Land 400 program include the purchase of vehicles that can swim or that are light enough to be lifted by helicopters in order to relieve strain on the ship’s limited landing craft?

The current landing-force vehicles weren’t designed for wading and can tolerate only about two feet of water. That could be ameliorated by a beach recovery-vehicle to drag drowned vehicles ashore and push off stuck landing craft but the ADF hasn’t got any of those. A large hovercraft could potentially eliminate the problem altogether but Canberra’s dock is the wrong type for those.

[ 本帖最後由 風中老叔 於 2014-11-29 08:01 AM 使用http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/androidD.jpg 編輯 ]



引用:
原帖由 風中老叔 於 2014-11-28 10:44 PM 發表
我怕呢條船會有麻煩。。。。。
。。。。多故障,,,,



http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/androidD.jpg
東西是西班牙造的, 西班牙船廠造艦算很可靠.



美!反XX利器?!哈哈哈哈哈哈!


無潛艇,點搞?
澳正建航母及反空大驅各二,
日後點夠軍艋?


canbera class LHD,
landing heli dock.

HOBART class AWD,air warfare destroyer.



www.janes.com/article/44335/aust ... -canberra-class-lhd









第二隻2016交付海軍。




First-of-class Canberra left BAE Systems' Williamstown shipyard for final sea trials on 12 August. Source: BAE Systems


www.janes.com/article/42115/ran- ... ns-final-sea-trials






5#
美國中校指出,兩棲作戰,
袋鼠欠缺三軍文化,
欠缺兩棲戰車,
只有四隻登陸艇,
。。。。
。。。。。。。

www.aspistrategist.org.au/a-big- ... hibious-capability/






[隱藏]
基本上全世界乜都欠缺,包括美國,如果你唔欠缺D軍火商摺埋啦






引用:
原帖由 觀滄海 於 2014-11-29 08:47 AM 發表
基本上全世界乜都欠缺,包括美國,如果你唔欠缺D軍火商摺埋啦



http://n2.hk/d/images/r10/mobile.jpg
觀滄海 , 你是對的,看看新國就知



風中兄,上面D link 得英文和來自澳洲?


你講乜嘢?唔明!






清朝和俄及國民政府亦欠缺很多,才輸給日本仔!






[隱藏]
引用:
原帖由 風中老叔 於 2014-11-29 09:08 PM 發表
你講乜嘢?唔明!



http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/androidD.jpg
等你回去.
http://news.discuss.com.hk/viewthread.php?tid=24072595&extra=&page=6



[按此隱藏 Google 建議的相符內容]