Golden Member
- 帖子
- 25456
- 積分
- 26720
- 註冊
- 2010-7-17
|
#1
發表於 2014-11-23 10:03
美航母被擊沉的紀錄,有書本為證！
航母，非大哂。
敵人知航母地點及動向，但不知敵人潛艇在那裡！
引用
書本
Lessons Not Learned: The U.S. Navy's Status Quo Culture
By Roger Thompson (M.A.)
Appendix A
U.S.N. Ships Theoretically Destroyed or Incapacitated in Exercises as reported by the Media since 1981，
自1981年.媒體上美艦被(擊沉)記錄，有船名的才出來
Ship Type ，Date， Attacker，
種類，日期，攻擊者
U.S.S. America Aircraft carrier 1981 Canadian submarine
U.S.S. Forrestal (?) Aircraft carrier 1981 Submarine
U.S.S. Constellation Aircraft carrier 1997 Russian submarine
U.S.S. Theodore Roosevelt Aircraft carrier 1999 Dutch submarine
U.S.S. Kitty Hawk Aircraft carrier 2000 Russian Air Force
U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln Aircraft carrier 2000 Australian submarine
U.S.S. Independence Aircraft carrier 1996 Chilean submarine
U.S.S. Boise Nuclear submarine 1999 Dutch submarine
U.S.S. Olympia Nuclear submarine 2002 Australian submarine
U.S.S. Montpelier Nuclear submarine 2001 Chilean submarine
U.S.S. City of Corpus Christi Nuclear Submarine 2003 Australian submarine
U.S.S. Mount Whitney Command ship 1999 Dutch submarine
Note: This table is based on publicly available English media sources such as newspapers, magazines, books, journals and broadcast media. Only ships that have been named have been included. There have been many others, but unfortunately these ships were not specifically named in the reports.
[url]books.google.com.sg/books?id=Tqj9ZP8FsJEC&pg=PA185&lpg=PA185&dq=U.S.S.+Constellation+Aircraft+carrier+1997+Russian+submarine&source=bl&ots=BIU3H2K67m&sig=I5czxHpdoGmv37uKWitceTx13KI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=UDpxVI2xL4mzuAT46YGACw&ved=0CBwQ6AEwAQ[/url]
以上引述自以下文章，
www.cuttingedge.org/news_updates/nz1839.htm
引用
Is the U.S. Navy Overrated (5.1)?
An Updated Knightsbridge Working Paper
Copyright 2004 By Roger Thompson，
Professor of Military Studies, Knightsbridge University.
The opinions expressed herein are those of the author, and are not to be construed as the opinions of Knightsbridge University. This is a work in progress and supercedes all previous versions. It may be revised and updated as required.
Introduction: David versus Goliath at Sea。
大衛對巨人
In 1981, The NATO exercise Ocean Venture ended with much embarrassment for the U.S. Navy, and more specifically, its
its enormously expensive aircraft carrier battle groups. During the exercise, a Canadian submarine slipped quietly through the aircraft carrier U.S.S. America’s destroyer screen, and conducted a devastating simulated torpedo attack on the ship. The submarine was never detected, and the exercise umpire, a U.S. Navy officer, pronounced the carrier “dead.”
軍演裁判宣布航母死了
One analyst has stated that a second carrier, presumably the U.S.S. Forrestal, was also reportedly destroyed by another enemy submarine during this exercise.
Later, the U.S.N. umpire tried to use material from his official report in a magazine article, but when his superiors read it, his work was promptly stamped “classified” to minimize the potential fallout. Unfortunately, an anonymous Canadian submariner leaked the story to a local newspaper, and indicated that this successful Canadian attack on an American supercarrier was by no means an isolated incident.
It was a simple ambush in the North Atlantic, and it worked perfectly. Indeed, the article concluded that the Americans never knew what hit them, that they were embarrassed by this failure, and that they wanted to bury the matter then and there. The Canadian diesel submarine ambushed a surface ship in the same way that Germany’s U-boats had done it decades before.
This news caused quite a stir in Congress, and the U.S. Navy had a lot of explaining to do. Why had not one but two U.S.N. carriers been sunk? Why indeed had a small, 1960s-vintage diesel submarine of the under-funded Canadian Navy been able to defeat one of America’s most powerful and expensive warships, and with such apparent ease?，，，。。。。
净移出人口51,900，即移民！！
過去幾年,年均约四萬九千人净移出,即移民，
2013年年中人口數字
http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201308/13/P201308130524.htm
谷歌下，xxxx年年中人口數字
|
